Maintaining Sanity in a World with a 24/7 Newscycle

There was a time when I was as transfixed by television news  as the next person. During the first Gulf War, September 11, Princess Diana’s death, I spent hours watching TV from my couch, or surfing the news websites for the latest developments. 

Being connected that way felt vital, urgent, and in a way, as if I were doing my duty by the victims. I thought my actions honored them. 

With time I came to see my vigil in a different light. And so, in the spirit of offering comfort to my American friends who are coping with the tragic events in Arizona, I have some suggestions: 

1. Understand the difference between a feeling of urgency and a true emergency

  • We are hard-wired to face threats with action and
  • The sheer quantity and detail of news these days can trick us into feeling present at the scene of an unspooling catastrophe.

These two facts push our caveman buttons. We reach for our spears when the “enemy” may be hundreds, if not thousands, of miles away.

Stop and think: are you, your loved ones or community in imminent danger? If they are, take appropriate action. If not, dial back the emotion. Take deep breaths. Notice your surroundings.

2. Separate venting from information

Much of what passes for reporting these days has the same level of intellectual rigor as speculation and gossip. Doubt me? Then note the number of retracted statements on any given news story. 

In part this is to fuel the voracious media machine, but reporters are people, too. Some are physically on site and unable to escape the news stream. In essence, they are vicariously traumatized through professional obligations.  

If you had a parent who was insensible and required an operation, which kind of physician would you prefer to give you informed consent? One in the grip of powerful emotion, or one committed to patient care but more intellectual? If the latter, mute your screen and notice the body language of the newscasters. Where do they fall on this spectrum?

3. Because you’ll need quality information to make decisions, consider:

  • Turning to print media over radio and television. The basics will be there, but without the emotion-provoking images and sounds.
  • Turning to another country’s media, especially if publicly funded. (eg. CBC, NPR, BBC). 
    • A country which does not bear the same psychic wounds as that of its victims will have a better chance of news objectivity. 
    • You may find perspective in seeing the world gripped by other events. Some might even constitute a more personal threat than the ones getting the most airplay.

4. Practice good self-care: 

Set limits on how much time you’ll invest in the news.

Notice what you’re doing to take care of your own physical/mental/spiritual and social wellbeing. Watch that you don’t numb the pain with alcohol, drugs, TV, or other self-destructive means. If there is a real threat, you need to be in good shape, not deconditioned from stress.

5. Reach for the highest courage/highest consideration response

Avoid blaming or shaming. You’ll have to live with your friends, neighbors and community long-term. In a news cycle that pushes the win-lose paradigm, be particularly careful to search out win-win thoughts. Be diligent in searching for hope, and stay silent until you are willing to listen. Your community deserves the best of your leadership skills.

Now, those are my recommendations for coping, but my list is by no means complete. What would you add? Are you getting better at filtering what’s essential from sensational? If so, what are your techniques?

If you liked this post you might also like:


6 thoughts on “Maintaining Sanity in a World with a 24/7 Newscycle

  1. I think you said something close, but I have to replace rhetoric with facts, and like you said, Jan, print media is the way to go there. Everybody is jumping so hard to be first with the news, they’re not fact checking and that disturbs me. Great post and great advice. I just hope the right people see it.

  2. I have to really shut off my “super empathy” thing or the “hyper-aware” or “author thing” or all three because you have these things hyper or super then it becomes too much . . . so I have to remove myself – hover above – something I’m rather good at it turns out … because of this and that.

    This is really good stuff, Miz Tart…. Thank you

  3. Kathy, thanks!

    Teresa, yes, print does trump TV and radio in the verifiable context. I wonder sometimes if it’s because it can feel more permanent.

    Kat, yes, if you’re empathic, these things are even harder to bear. And thank you!

  4. Newspapers not only help you maintain objectivity, they tend to tell more of the story…although I sometimes find myself asking questions they’ve failed to answer, not necessarily a bad thing. Twitter is prone to ultra fast ‘flash’ reporting, ie, only one or two details due to space constrains. It seems those I follow are getting better at being more objective instead of offering knee jerk reactions. Perhaps it’s a kind of collective psychological growth.

Leave a Reply